A significant political storm has erupted in Gujarat today, September 17, 2025, after reports confirmed that the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has refused to bear the funeral expenses of its recently deceased former Chief Minister, Vijay Rupani. This unprecedented decision has sparked widespread outrage across the state’s political landscape and among the public, leading to sharp criticism from opposition parties and raising questions about political protocols and party loyalty. The controversy comes just days after the passing of the veteran leader.
The dispute centers on a fundamental expectation: when a prominent political figure, especially a former Chief Minister, passes away, their party often steps in to support the family with funeral arrangements and costs. However, in the case of former CM Vijay Rupani, who served the state from 2016 to 2021, the BJP has reportedly stated that it will not provide financial assistance for his last rites.
Sources close to Rupani’s family indicated that while a state funeral was conducted with full honors (which is standard protocol for former CMs and covered by the state government), the private, cultural, and community aspects of the funeral arrangements, which often incur significant costs, were not offered financial backing by the party. This perceived lack of support from his own party has deeply hurt Rupani’s supporters and has become a major talking point in Gujarat politics.
Key Quote
A prominent opposition leader, speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the matter, expressed strong disapproval:
“It’s disheartening. For a leader who dedicated decades to the party and led the state, to deny basic support for his family during such a personal tragedy is a shocking display of insensitivity. It questions the very values of loyalty and respect within the party.”
Rupani’s Legacy and Sudden Resignation
Vijay Rupani was a well-respected figure in Gujarat BJP circles, known for his calm demeanor and long association with the RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) ideology. He took over as Chief Minister in a challenging period and navigated the state through various crises, including the initial waves of the COVID-19 pandemic.
However, his sudden and unexpected resignation in September 2021, just over a year before the state elections, had sent ripples through the party. While Rupani publicly stated it was a voluntary decision, political observers at the time believed it was a strategic move by the BJP high command to change leadership ahead of the crucial assembly polls. This past context is now being cited by some as a potential reason for the current cold shoulder from the party. Many are speculating if this decision is a reflection of a deeper internal rift or a new, harsher policy within the party regarding former leaders.
The controversy has ignited a fierce debate on social media, with many citizens expressing their dismay. Supporters of Rupani are highlighting his long and dedicated service to both the party and the state. They point out that denying even symbolic financial assistance in a time of grief goes against traditional Indian values and political courtesy. On the other hand, some sections within the BJP, speaking off the record, suggest that party funds are allocated for specific political activities and campaigns, and not for personal family expenses, even for former leaders. This stance, however, is being widely criticized for its perceived lack of compassion.
Next Steps
As the Gujarat BJP row intensifies, the party leadership is under immense pressure to clarify its position or perhaps even reverse its decision. Opposition parties are expected to seize upon this issue to highlight what they describe as the ruling party’s lack of respect for its own veterans. There may be calls for an official statement from the BJP central leadership or an intervention from the state unit to mitigate the growing public anger. This incident could potentially impact local political dynamics and public sentiment towards the BJP in Gujarat in the coming days.